Skip to main contentTake the Mold Risk Score. Find your path in 2 minutes ->
MoldCo

Editorial standards

How MoldCo publishes health content

The public site should be useful, sourced, clear about clinical limits, and safe for people making care or testing decisions.

Standards

The rules behind the content

These standards apply to launch pages, articles, testing pages, pSEO pages, and future Growth/Product edits.

Scope

MoldCo publishes public education, product information, pricing context, and care-pathway guidance. The public site does not provide patient-specific medical advice, diagnosis, emergency care, payments, records, or authenticated medical messaging. Those workflows belong in the patient app.

Authorship

Health content should use named authors and reviewers. Bylines and reviewer references resolve to public author profiles, and content without a named medical owner should avoid clinical certainty or treatment promises.

Evidence

Medical and environmental-health claims should rely on public-health agencies, peer-reviewed literature, clinical consensus, or recognized building-science standards. Articles should distinguish evidence, clinical interpretation, product information, and MoldCo point of view.

Claim boundaries

MoldCo can explain mold-related illness, CIRS-informed frameworks, testing, and care. The site should not promise a cure, diagnose CIRS from a checklist, imply that a single test proves causation, or replace a clinician's judgment.

Updates

Published content carries date metadata. Pages should be updated when pricing, product availability, clinical positioning, source material, legal requirements, or launch routing changes.

Corrections

Readers can send factual corrections, broken-source reports, or accessibility issues to support@moldco.com. Corrections should preserve the original URL whenever possible so backlinks and citations remain stable.